Destabilizing speculation

Beijing’s response to the Exchange Server hacking attribution. Content moderation and child protection? Big Tech is wary of certain public-private partnership proposals.


In one look.

  • China’s response to attribution of an Exchange Server attack.
  • Child protection and content moderation.
  • The US administration offers closer public-private cooperation against foreign cyber threats.

Beijing’s long response to attribution of the Exchange Server hack.

The Tennessee Tribune sums up US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s rebuke of the “model of irresponsible, disruptive and destabilizing behavior in cyberspace,” which has shamed the CCP for deploying criminals to the tune of “billions of dollars. dollars in stolen intellectual property, ransom payments, and cybersecurity mitigation efforts. Blinken also highlighted Washington’s international work to “promote responsible state behavior in cyberspace, fight cybercrime and oppose digital authoritarianism”.

The Global Times has Beijing’s lengthy response to the “baseless accusations” and the “attempt to contain China.” The “wacky evidence” and “so-called technical details” presented by the United States, according to the Times, represent the “typical thing of a thief shouting” Stop the thief “” and obscure Washington’s long history in the matter. of “computer malfeasance”. This story spans the gamut from zero days hoarding and spying on Beijing’s breakthroughs to Stuxnet and the Merkel scandal.

The Times warns that President Biden’s “relentless efforts to form an anti-China chorus” (in addition to “confusing good and evil”) could take relations “to a new low.” In particular, the CCP is concerned about the involvement of NATO, which for the first time “introduces[es] a military alliance in cyberspace ”and risks launching a cyber“ arms race ”. President Biden must reject the “pirate blame,” the article says, as well as all his gatherings of people around Hong Kong, Xinjiang, the South China Sea, vaccines, the climate, and so on.

For children, Beijing style.

The register describes improving the environment for the Summer Youth Network of the China Cyberspace Administration (CAC), a well-implemented “zero tolerance” guideline that aims to mop up the Chinese Internet for the sake of the Chinese. children. Platforms must strengthen their ‘youth fashions’ and ‘anti-addiction systems’ in addition to removing consumerism, celebrity worship, violence, crime, indecency, bullying and baby-mouth marketing. . The CAC recently issued other orders on emoticons, data collection and decorum. A translation of the directive urges platforms to “vigorously rectify the chaos of online issues that endanger the physical and mental health of minors”.

Big Tech isn’t that crazy about this public-private security cooperation.

Foreign policy says big business is cracking down on the Biden administration’s “spread” of cybersecurity because the big business consumer base covers Beijing. Unlike companies in Russia and China, US companies prefer to maintain plausible autonomy from the state. There have been some recent give-and-take, however. Microsoft intervened in the Exchange Server hack, for which President Biden has so far refused to sanction China, despite direct attribution to affiliates of the Ministry of State Security. (Foreign policy presents this as a bone for business.) The administration plans to meet with industry leaders at the end of August to define other avenues for collaboration.


Comment here

placeholder="Your Comment">